RPO · vCISO · MSP Capacity

Add evidence operations capacity without changing your client methodology

White-label or coordinated CMMC evidence operations capacity for RPOs, vCISOs, and MSPs with recurring client evidence work.

01

One-client pilot before portfolio rollout

02

Direct or white-label delivery skin

03

Client-owned artifacts and transparent activity logs

04

No interference with partner judgment, assessment, or technical services

Separate expert judgment from recurring logistics

Senior CMMC practitioners create more value when they interpret scope, advise on implementation, and resolve exceptions. Repeatedly asking for training exports, policy approvals, access reviews, visitor logs, provider attestations, and corrected screenshots is necessary work, but it is not the best use of scarce senior capacity.

A visible operating contract

Every client workflow defines the scope, request cadence, partner review points, escalation rules, client repository, and deliverable skin. The chase log lets the partner verify that the service occurred rather than relying on an unobservable subcontractor promise.

  • RPO/vCISO: retains implementation and sufficiency judgment.
  • MSP: retains operation of the technical environment and production of technical evidence.
  • Gridex: runs the cross-owner evidence queue and factual status record.
  • Client official: retains decisions and affirmation responsibility.

Start with the client most likely to prove the model

The first client should already have an established scope and repository but show obvious evidence drift, owner-chasing load, or a near-term trigger. That keeps the pilot bounded and makes the capacity benefit measurable.

What the work produces

Concrete, client-owned operating records

Partner-branded monthly digest
Objective-level evidence ledger
Timestamped chase log
Escalation queue for partner judgment
Client-owned assessment handoff
Responsibility boundary

Facts, not verdicts

Gridex never represents itself as the partner, an assessor, or the party issuing CMMC findings unless the engagement and public disclosures explicitly authorize the relationship. C3PAO independence requirements must be handled separately.

Questions buyers ask

Frequently asked questions

Does Gridex replace our existing CMMC workflow?

No. The partner defines the methodology and review gates. Gridex operates the recurring evidence logistics inside that structure.

Can the deliverables be white-labeled?

A partner skin is available for appropriate RPO, vCISO, or MSP relationships. C3PAO independence and disclosure constraints require a separate referral structure.

How do we test the relationship?

Start with one client, one agreed evidence scope, one month, and explicit success criteria for response time, status coverage, and partner review load.

Primary references

Source context

Start with one bounded scope

Bring the evidence state you actually have.

Gridex will map the operating work, the human judgment boundary, and the safest next step.

Discuss a partner workflow →