What are Illinois' annual reporting requirements for AI in hiring?

Last verified: June 1, 2026

Answer

HB-3773, the 2026 Illinois Human Rights Act amendment, contains no annual reporting requirement; it governs AI non-discrimination and employee notice only. The sole annual report for AI in Illinois hiring comes from a separate, older law — the AI Video Interview Act (820 ILCS 42, Section 20). Employers using AI video analysis must report applicant race and ethnicity data to DCEO by December 31 each year.

A common misconception: Illinois HB-3773 (the 2026 Illinois Human Rights Act amendment) does NOT contain any annual reporting requirement. HB-3773 prohibits discriminatory AI in employment and requires notice to employees that AI is being used — but no annual report. Annual reporting for AI in Illinois hiring comes from a separate, older law: the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act (PA 101-0260, codified at 820 ILCS 42), Section 20, which was added by PA 102-47 (effective January 1, 2022). Under Section 20, Illinois employers who use AI to analyze applicant video interviews must: (1) collect racial/ethnicity data for applicants denied an in-person follow-up interview because of their AI-analyzed video interview; (2) collect racial/ethnicity data for applicants who are hired; and (3) report both data sets annually to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) by December 31. DCEO then analyzes the data for racial bias and reports findings to the Governor and General Assembly by July 1. This is the only annual reporting obligation for AI in Illinois hiring under current law — the Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) is not the enforcement agency, and no broader AI hiring registry exists.

Scope

Resolves a common misconception by separating two Illinois regimes: HB-3773 (PA 103-0804, the IHRA amendment) carries no annual report, while the only annual AI-hiring report comes from the AI Video Interview Act §20 (DCEO). It does not cover BIPA or Colorado/Texas obligations.

Operational implication

The DCEO report is a data-pipeline obligation, not a disclosure. Employers using AI video analysis must capture applicant race/ethnicity at the right ATS stages — applicants denied an in-person interview and applicants hired — and file with DCEO by December 31 annually. That requires demographic collection wired into the hiring workflow plus retention of the underlying records.

Applicable Regulations

HB-3773

Illinois Human Rights Act AI Amendment (Public Act 103-0804)

enacted

Amends the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/) to prohibit employers from using artificial intelligence that subjects employees or applicants to discrimination based on protected classes, and from using zip codes as a proxy for protected classes. Requires employers to notify employees when AI is used in recruitment, hiring, promotion, discharge, discipline, or other terms and conditions of employment. Defines "artificial intelligence" and "generative artificial intelligence" for purposes of the Act.

Key Requirements

AI Discrimination Prohibition Cannot use AI that has the effect of subjecting employees to discrimination on the basis of protected classes identified under the Illinois Human Rights Act
Zip Code Proxy Ban Cannot use zip codes as a proxy for protected classes under the Illinois Human Rights Act
Employee Notice of AI Use Must provide notice to an employee that the employer is using AI for recruitment, hiring, promotion, discharge, discipline, or other employment-related decisions
Effective: 2026-01-01 Penalties: Enforced through the Illinois Human Rights Act framework by the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR); remedies follow IHRA procedures (injunctive relief, damages, attorney's fees) rather than a specific monetary penalty schedule in the amendment itself.
PA-101-0260

Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act (820 ILCS 42)

enacted

Enacted 2019 (PA 101-260), effective 2020-01-01. Amended by PA 102-47 (effective 2022-01-01) to add DCEO demographic reporting. Regulates Illinois employers who use AI to analyze applicant video interviews. Requires notice, explanation of AI, and written consent before analysis; limits video sharing; mandates 30-day deletion on applicant request; requires annual demographic reporting to DCEO.

Key Requirements

Notice, Explanation, and Written Consent Before any AI analysis of a video interview, notify the applicant that AI may be used, explain how the AI works and what characteristics it evaluates, and obtain written consent (Section 5)
Video Sharing Restrictions May share applicant videos only with individuals whose expertise or technology is necessary to evaluate the applicant's fitness (Section 10)
30-Day Deletion on Request Upon applicant request, employer must delete the video within 30 days and instruct all other recipients with copies or backups to delete them (Section 15)
Annual DCEO Demographic Reporting Collect racial/ethnicity data for applicants denied in-person interviews via AI analysis and for hired applicants; report annually to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity by December 31 (Section 20, added by PA 102-47)
Effective: 2020-01-01 Penalties: The Act itself does not specify monetary penalties. Enforcement is primarily through reporting obligations (Section 20) and general Illinois employment / consumer protection frameworks; violators may face related claims under the Illinois Human Rights Act or common-law causes of action.

Industry Context

HR & Recruiting Firms

Staffing agencies, recruiting firms, and HR technology providers that use AI for candidate sourcing, resume screening, interview analysis, and employment decision support. These firms face heightened regulatory scrutiny because AI in hiring directly affects individuals' economic opportunities.

Typical Compliance Gaps

No bias audit or disparate impact testing of hiring AI tools
No applicant notification that AI is used in screening or scoring
Lack of documentation linking AI outputs to adverse employment decisions
Unaware of AI exclusion endorsements in EPL or E&O policies

Where this lands operationally

Gridex turns the compliance or coverage question into operated workflow controls: intake, review points, audit trails, and the places a person stays in the decision.

Discuss a Governed Hiring Workflow

Confirm whether your AI video tools trigger the DCEO report and stand up the demographic-data pipeline with Gridex's governed AI deployment workflow (/services/governed-ai-deployment/); scope it with a hiring compliance review (/services/ai-hiring-compliance-review/).

Discuss a Governed Hiring Workflow

Related Questions

  • Can I use AI for hiring in Illinois? Yes, but two distinct Illinois laws apply. HB-3773 (effective January 1, 2026) amended the Illinois Human Rights Act to prohibit employers from using AI that discriminates against protected classes or uses zip codes as a proxy, and it requires notice to employees that AI is being used in employment decisions (recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, tenure, or terms and conditions). Separately, the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act (PA 101-0260, 820 ILCS 42), in effect since 2020, applies specifically when AI analyzes applicant video interviews: employers must notify the applicant, explain how the AI works, obtain written consent, limit video sharing to necessary evaluators, delete videos within 30 days of an applicant's request, and — per the 2022 amendment (PA 102-47) — report applicant racial/ethnicity data annually to DCEO. If AI hiring tools also capture biometric identifiers (e.g., facial geometry from video), the separate Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) creates additional consent and liability obligations. Illinois employers using AI for any form of employment decision should map their process against all three regimes.
  • What are the AI video interview consent requirements in Illinois? Illinois' AI video interview consent requirements come from the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act (PA 101-0260, codified at 820 ILCS 42), not HB-3773. Under Section 5 of the Act, before using AI to analyze an applicant's video interview, the employer must: (1) notify the applicant in advance that AI may be used to analyze the video interview and consider the applicant's fitness for the position; (2) explain how the AI works and what general types of characteristics it uses to evaluate applicants; and (3) obtain written consent from the applicant. Under Section 10, employers may share applicant videos only with individuals whose expertise or technology is necessary to evaluate the applicant's fitness — not with third parties generally. Under Section 15, if the applicant requests deletion, the employer must delete all copies within 30 days and instruct any other recipients (with copies or backups) to delete theirs as well. The Act has been in effect since January 1, 2020, with demographic reporting added by a 2022 amendment (PA 102-47). Note: broader employment-AI discrimination rules — including a separate employee-notice requirement and a ban on zip-code proxies — are addressed in HB-3773 (IHRA amendment, effective January 1, 2026), which is distinct from this Video Interview Act.
  • What are the penalties for violating Illinois AI hiring law? Illinois does not have a single unified penalty scheme for AI hiring violations; enforcement depends on which law is violated. HB-3773 (Illinois Human Rights Act amendment, effective January 1, 2026) does not itself specify monetary penalties — violations are enforced through IHRA procedures by the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR), with remedies including injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees. The Illinois AI Video Interview Act (PA 101-0260, 820 ILCS 42) similarly does not specify monetary penalties within the Act; enforcement is primarily through the Section 20 reporting obligation to DCEO and general Illinois employment / consumer protection frameworks. If an AI hiring tool captures biometric identifiers (e.g., facial geometry during video interviews, voice prints), the separate Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA, 740 ILCS 14/) applies via private right of action and carries specific statutory damages: $1,000 per negligent violation or $5,000 per intentional/reckless violation (or actual damages, whichever is greater), plus attorneys' fees and costs and possible injunctive relief. The 2024 BIPA amendment (SB 2979, effective August 2, 2024) clarifies that repeated collection of the same biometric identifier from the same person using the same method counts as a single violation per individual, limiting the per-scan damage multipliers that drove earlier class-action exposure.
  • Which states require disclosure when AI screens resumes? Illinois and Colorado are the clearest state-level disclosure regimes for AI-assisted employment screening. Illinois requires notice for AI use in employment decisions under HB-3773, and written consent plus an explanation before AI analyzes video interviews under the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act. Colorado's reenacted AI Act (SB 26-189) requires interaction notice, adverse-outcome disclosure, data correction, and meaningful human review when ADMT makes or substantially influences consequential employment decisions, with obligations beginning January 1, 2027. Texas does not currently impose a private-sector candidate disclosure rule for resume screening; HB-2060 was a state-agency inventory law, while TRAIGA (HB-149) can still matter for discriminatory or biometric AI uses.