Direct answer
A working AI governance framework should include a written AI use policy, an inventory of where AI makes or materially influences consequential decisions, documentation and record-keeping requirements, defined human-review points, incident-response procedures, and regular audits. Because Colorado's AI Act (SB 26-189) replaced the old impact-assessment and high-risk-classification model with disclosure, consumer-notice, and human-review duties, the framework should map to those obligations rather than the repealed assessment regime.
An AI governance framework should include an AI use policy, an inventory of where AI makes or substantially influences consequential decisions, documentation requirements, incident response procedures, and regular audit mechanisms. Note that Colorado's AI Act (SB 26-189, which repealed and reenacted SB 24-205) dropped the old impact-assessment and high-risk-classification model in favor of disclosure, consumer-notice, and human-review duties — so a framework should map to those obligations rather than the repealed assessment regime.
Scope
General governance guidance, not legal advice. The right components depend on your jurisdictions, industries, which decisions AI touches, how much autonomy tools have, and how your contracts and insurance allocate AI risk. Regulatory duties such as Colorado's change over time and vary by state, so confirm current obligations with qualified counsel.
Operational implication
A framework only reduces risk once it is operated, not just written. Gridex turns governance components into running workflow controls — the AI inventory, the human-review checkpoints, the audit trail, and insurance-ready documentation — so the policy maps to what actually happens when AI makes a consequential decision.
Applicable Regulations
On 2026-05-14 Governor Polis signed SB 26-189, which repeals and reenacts the Colorado AI Act (originally SB 24-205). The new law abandons the risk-management / annual-impact-assessment model and replaces it with a disclosure-and-notice framework governing "automated decision-making technology" (ADMT) that makes or substantially influences "consequential decisions" (education, employment, housing, financial services, insurance, healthcare, government services). The statute formally takes effect 2026-08-12 (no safety clause), but all substantive compliance obligations — for both deployers and developers — begin 2027-01-01, which is the operative date for regulated businesses; the Attorney General's implementing rules are also due by 2027-01-01. The AG has stated he will not enforce until the mandatory rulemaking process concludes.
Key Requirements
Interaction Notice Deployers must give clear notice at the point of interaction when a consumer interacts with an automated decision-making technology (ADMT)
Adverse-Outcome Disclosure Provide a plain-language explanation within 30 days of an adverse consequential decision made or substantially influenced by an ADMT
Data Correction Right Allow consumers to request correction of factually incorrect personal data used by the ADMT
Meaningful Human Review Provide meaningful human review and reconsideration after an adverse consequential decision
Developer Documentation Developers must supply technical documentation (intended uses, known harmful uses, training-data categories, known limitations and risks, and instructions enabling meaningful human review), notify deployers of material updates, and retain compliance records for 3+ years. Like all duties under the act, these obligations begin 2027-01-01
Effective: 2027-01-01 Penalties: Enforced exclusively by the Colorado Attorney General; violations are treated as deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. Before enforcement the AG must give 60 days' written notice and an opportunity to cure; this cure right sunsets 2030-01-01, after which enforcement may be immediate. The AG has stated no enforcement will occur until the mandatory rulemaking process concludes.
Where this lands operationally
Gridex turns the compliance or coverage question into operated workflow controls: intake, review points, audit trails, and the places a person stays in the decision.
Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. AI regulations and insurance policy terms change frequently. Consult with a qualified attorney or insurance professional for advice specific to your situation. Gridex makes no warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information.